Showing posts with label Veronica Escobar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Veronica Escobar. Show all posts

Monday, March 13, 2017

All-White Texas Historical Commission Listens to White-Dominated Chamber of Commerce




All-White Texas Historical Commission Listens to White-Dominated Chamber of Commerce
El Paso Greater Chamber of Commence Uses Influence to Deny Historical Designation to Union Plaza / Duranguito


Was it really surprising that an all-White historical commission would reject historical designations to area in of El Paso of great historical significance to people of color in El Paso?


The Texas Historical Commission states it: 

“…works to save the real places that tell the real

stories of Texas. THC staff consults with

citizens and organizations to preserve Texas’

architectural, archaeological and cultural

landmarks. The agency is recognized nationally

for its preservation programs.”



“The THC is composed of 12 citizen members appointed

by the governor to staggered six-year terms. The agency

employs about 175 people who work in various fields,

including archaeology, architecture, history, economic

development, heritage tourism, public administration

and urban planning.”



Source: Website of the Historical Commission.



According to the US Census regarding Texas: 



Hispanic Population is 38.8 percent.

American Indians 1 percent

Asian 4.7

Black, African American 12.5 percent.



So with Asians, Africans Americans, American Indians, and Hispanics, these groups of color make up 57 percent of the population of Texas.



Yet, the twelve-person Texas Historical Commission has no persons of color on it. Now, we are just going by surname and photos posted at http://www.thc.texas.gov/about/commissioners.



Currently, the website only listed 9 members not twelve.



If we analyzed based on surname, none of the commissioners have Hispanic surname or surname that would be Asian (maybe Nau). In looking at the photos listed on the page above, none of the commissioners look Asian, African American, or Hispanic.



John L. Nau, III

Monica Burdette

Earl Broussard

John Crain


Wallace B. Jefferson

Tom Perini

Gilbert E. Paterson

Robert Shepard

Daisy Sloan White



Although this is not the best indicator of the demographics of the commission, it’s a safe bet to say that no or hardly any commissioners are people of color.



I also scoured the bios connected to each commissioner to look for indication of any memberships in organization associated with people of color. Nothing.



So in a state where almost 60 percent of the State’s population is people of color, none or hardly any of the 9 commissioners are persons of color.



That should be of no surprise as most are appointed by the governor to six year terms. In looking at the anti-people of color politics of our current governor Greg Abbott and our former governor Rick Perry, it’s predictable to say that they would not appoint any people of color to this commission.



Regional



It is also interesting to note that at the same website, it lists where these commissioner live. Only one of the nine is from West Texas. None are from the Valley of Texas, another large region of people of color in Texas. None are from San Antonio, another city with a large Hispanic population.



Greater El Paso Chamber of Commerce



So why would a letter from the El Paso Chamber of Commerce be so influential. It’s a good bet that the El Paso Chamber of Commerce has not corresponded or corresponded very little with the State Historical Commission in decades.



Looking more local



The Great of Chamber of Commerce is a little more diverse.



Thirty seven of the 109 Governing Board Members has Hispanic surnames and at least one is known to us to be African American. That means for a city that is 81.3 percent Hispanic and 86.7% people of color, the Governing Board of the Greater El Paso Chamber of Commerce only 33 percent of the board is Hispanic.



The Chamber of Commerce Executive Board has a 19 members. Eight members have Hispanic surnames. So in a city with 81.3 percent Hispanics, less than a third of the Chamber Executive Board is Hispanic.


You have to remember, there is a reason why Hispanic chambers of commerce were founded in most cities. It was because of exclusion from the regular chamber of commerce.



Is it surprising?



We must ask ourselves, is it surprising that a State Historical Commission with no people of color and a Greater El Paso Chamber of Commerce that only a third of their Governing Board being Hispanic would conspire to reject historical status for places in the Union Plaza district of significance to people of color.

The history of Mexican Americans has been under attack for generations. First our history was not taught at all, and more recently, the Texas Board of Education recommended a racist Mexican American history text book. 

This movement by the Chamber is just another continued action against the culture of people of color, not even the first.



 

Even taking out the action of the El Paso County Judge, is it real surprising?

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Tania Chozet’s Platform is Pure Fantasy and Fiction


Photo downloaded from Facebook 
Tania Chozet’s Platform is Pure Fantasy and Fiction



Editorial

 

District 7 Needs Intelligent Decisions in this post-Steve Ortega District 7 era.

 

Ask any private sector employer if they hire people who make intelligent decisions or “tough decisions”.

 

Hands down, they will pick intelligent decision makers because informed and thoughtful decisions are successful.

 

After a review of Tania Chozet’s campaign mailers for District 7 City Representative, it is painfully obvious she either has no clue what a City Representative does or she is hoping the District 7 voters do not.  

 

District 7 has suffered through 8 years of Steve Ortega who only represented and defended special interests while ignoring and harming the people he was supposed to represent.

 

Tania Chozet will continue to represent the same special interests as Ortega and not the interests of the people in District 7.

 

How do we know? --- Look at her record on County Commissioners Court

 

Chozet’s voting record as a County Commissioner shows she was nothing more than a rubberstamp vote and part of a 3-person majority voting bloc for the County Judge.

 

So What Does Chozet Claim?

 

Better Transparency and More Accountability

 

1. Chozet claims “She knows transparency in government means more than being informed after the fact. She believes the best decisions are made when the public has a chance to be heard first. She will make sure every voice is heard. She will make sure the bureaucrats at city hall are held accountable for every dollar they spend. She will keep all our taxpayer money from going towards administration and salaries”

 

Bull!

 

Without holding a single meeting in the district, she was appointed to represent to get input, feedback, or to hear all those voices before her vote:

 

  1. Chozet rubberstamped County Judge Veronica Escobar’s raise;
  2. Chozet voted for 110 million in Certificates of Obligation, non-voter approved debt;
  3. Chozet voted to raise the county tax rate 14.67%. The maximum allowed by Texas law that would not require voter approval. Anything above would have had to gone to voters –
    1. 40% of the increase was for - you guessed it – an increase in salaries of elected officials and employees -- 40% of the increase was to pay off the 110 million in non-voter approved debt she voted for.
    2. 20% was to reduce the County’s reliance on debt which means she shifted an increase to property taxes instead. Not exactly a watchdog for the taxpayer or a way to help local businesses thrive.

 

Chozet rubberstamped money in the County Capital Improvement Plan for $16,000 printers, $2000 trash cans, and a $1500 chair for the County Judge without question! Not exactly a watchdog for the taxpayer.

 

2. Chozet claims “In just a short time as Commissioner she was able to improve the QOL for families and make government more accountable to the people. She’ll do the same as District 7 Representative.”

 

Chozet never once initiated or hosted a community meeting!

 

How did Chozet make government accountable and transparent to the people when she did not hold herself accountable to those she was supposed to represent?

 

She never met with constituents to ask what their needs were much less initiate or fund any projects.

 

How did Chozet improve Quality of Life when she accomplished nothing?

 

More Jobs

 

3. Chozet claims “She will use her experience working with Fortune 500 companies to highlight our positive points and create new opportunities for companies to visit El Paso.”

 

Is Chozet inflating her resume? Is she exaggerating her experience?

 

According to her resume, as a new psychology graduate, she was employed by The GAP, a Fortune 500 company. She worked for a Fortune 500 company not exactly “with Fortune 500’s.” That statement is beyond misleading!

 

4. Chozet claims “She has a 3 point job plan to identify companies looking for expansion or new headquarters, promote El Paso as a relocation option, and work with existing companies to expand and bring better jobs.”

 

If Chozet has the skills, experience, and contacts to accomplish this then why is she a 37 year old unemployed lawyer living at home with her parents?

 

Chozet’s 3-point job “plan” is not exactly a plan and not a function of a City Representative.

 

Even the El Paso Times stated creating jobs is not within the realm of possibilities as a valid platform point for a City Representative.

 

Job creation and promoting the city are primarily a private sector and somewhat a Mayoral function.

 

Makes one wonder why the Times endorsed her.

 

The job of a City Representative is to work with and for the residents in the District they were elected to represent to improve quality of life in neighborhoods which in turn improves the city as a whole.

 

5. Chozet says “she’s going to partner with State and Federal governments for jobs.”

 

Seriously????

 

Did she sleep through both the State and Federal Legislative sessions? Or is she simply out of touch with reality?

 

Both the State and Federal government are furloughing and reducing their work force.

 

There is no money!

And if there were money, an entire City Council much less a City Representative has ZERO influence on how that money is spent.

 


El Paso already has too many government jobs and not enough private sector jobs.

 

Taxpayers pay the salaries of government employees and these jobs do not generate revenue and are not sustainable.

 

6. Chozet has stated she supports Downtown.

 

There are 630 properties in the Downtown district.

Half the properties are publically owned and not on the tax roles.

The taxable value of the all the property in Downtown was $282 million in 2009 and $285 million in 2012.

After the hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars in forced taxpayer investment, subsidies, and 10 year tax rebates all the Downtown properties combined only increased by $3 million dollars since 2009!

 

And Chozet wants to continue robbing revenue from the taxpayers for the benefit of a few ?????

 

Tough decision” - too bad it’s not an Intelligent or Informed one.

 

District 7 needs an honest and legitimate Representative and clearly Chozet’s record and “platform” proves she is neither.

Monday, April 29, 2013

Is Tania Chozet Just Steve Ortega in a Skirt?


 
Is Tania Chozet Just Steve Ortega in a Skirt?
District 7 Candidate Strangely Resembles Steve Ortega; Comparisons Frightening
 
by Ben and Jerry
 
Chozet claims as the Precinct 3 County Commissioner, she devoted herself self full-time to her constituents and served with honesty and integrity
 
In the entire 9 months that Tania Chozet occupied Precinct 3 she never once initiated a community meeting with “her constituents.”  According to constituents who addressed her at Commissioners Court, she was rude, denigrating, and refused to listen. Sound familiar?
 
No honesty there
In true Ortega style Chozet appears to have struck a quid pro quo deal in exchange for support from the former Yucca Neighborhood Association President who is also supporting Ortega?
 
On her website, she states she will work hard to ensure the new recreation center near Yucca Park is delivered on-time and within budget.
 
Chozet is ignoring residents before she’s even elected.
 
Many more residents want the recreation center on North Loop around Lomaland Park because it serves more people who do not have a center.
 
Carolina Recreation Center is within walking distance of Yucca Park, actually on the same street. Why build something so close?
 
Furthermore, Yucca Park already has another bond project.
 
No integrity or community inclusion there
 
Chozet claimed as Precinct 3 County Commissioner she was the driving force behind a collaboration with the City of El Paso for Mission Trail planning.
 
Truth is there are multiple Mission Trail Plans – none of them generated by Chozet.
 
Apparently “The Plan” was to decide on one of multiple existing Mission Trail Plans. 
 
She circumvented Representative Eddie Holguin who actually represents part of the area and made a joint announcement with Steve Ortega who represents no one.
 
Nothing happened beyond that announcement.
 
Chucoleaks email shows no one else seemed to be aware of a “collaboration.”
 
 
No honesty, integrity or community inclusion there
 
More than half of Chozet’s campaign contributors are the same special interests that fund Ortega. For an attorney that worked for the ACLU, this is a 180. Her funders are heavily Republican and heavily Paso del Norte Group(PDNG)/Borderplex Alliance members (see financial report on file with Municipal Clerk, City of El Paso). What a disappointment!
 
The Sheriff claims she was better than the previous commissioner.
 
How high is that standard? The previous commissioner was convicted of drug dealing!
 
The County Judge claims she has the heart of a public servant. No surprise there, since Chozet rubber stamped the County Judge’s raise.
 
Like Ortega, apparently Chozet is an unemployed lawyer still living with her parents (see address listed on financial report and Central Appraisal District)(Ortega lived with his parents when he first ran). Now like Ortega, she has decided to become a career politician. Now, it's no sin to live with your parents, but at this stage no incumbent city council member lives with their parents -- even Ortega. She has no financial investment in District 7: does not own a home and does not rent a home or apartment.
 
Chozet with Rep. Suzie Byrd (right) at Steve Ortega for Mayor Rally. County Judge Veronica Escobar on stage.
 
 
Can District 7 really afford 4 more years of arrogance with no representation, no honesty, and no integrity from someone with no financial investment in District 7?

-----
 
The majority of Tania Chozet's campaign donations came from15 PDNG members:*

PDNG $13,700

PSB Board Members $800

Ortegas family $400

 

PDNG

Bill Sanders $2,000 – co-founder

JA Cardwell $2,000

J Robert Brown $2,000

Kirk Robison $2,000

Bob Hoy $1,000

Steve Fox $1,000

Ginger Francis $1,000

Rick Francis $1,000

Steve Hoy  $500

J.O. Stewart $500

Gary Hedrick $250  -

Myrna Deckert $250 – co-founder and former executive director

Jody Casey Feinberg $100

Deborah Kastrin E100  (Sister is one of primary people pushing for lower valley port of entry)

 

PDNG $13,700

 

PSB Board Members

Maria Teran $500

Ed Escudero $300

PSB Board Members $800

 

Ortegas Family

Marc Cioc Ortega $100

Lina Ortega $150

Roberto & Sylvia Ortega $150

 

Ortegas family $400

  

Anna Aleman $100 – executive director of FEMAP the Guadalupe de La Vega

Jessica Anna Cabot $300

Anna Cabot $100

Tracey Yellen $250 – associate of Myrna Deckert in MJD & Associates and Veronica Escobar and Suzie Byrd

Rosemary Neill $100

Eddie Sosa $100

Gloria and Charles Ambler $100

Katherine Brennand $100

Sofia Appleby $100  - executive director of Community Scholars

Veronica Escobar $100 (Ortega Friend)

Michael Wyatt $100 (Ortega friend)

Selena Solis $100 (married to Joel Guzman who is employee of Hunt and Ortega friend)